Headline: “Town Spends $1,000 on Rubber Chickens”
And that’s not all:
[Cicero, Illinois] Town President Larry Dominick’s administration has also spent nearly $600,000 on promotional items, including mouse pads and ice cream scoops, from You & Me.
Hanania said he expects proceeds from the Houby Day festival to pay the bill for the chickens.
“It is what it is. We’re not hiding it. We’re trying to be aboveboard,” he said.
His transparency is laudable. But he forgets about opportunity costs. Rubber chickens aren’t exactly revenue magnets. They are unlikely to add more than their cost to Cicero, Illinois’s town coffers. Meanwhile, those thousand dollars could have been put to some better use — schools, police or fire protection, fixing potholes, you name it. Surely those things are more desirable than 250 rubber chickens.
Workforce Central Florida, a government agency, is spending $73,000 to give away 6,000 capes and some cardboard cutouts.
Most people doubt Congress’ ability to spend money wisely. The stimulus has given them some proof:
-$800,000 for an African genital-washing program.
-$700,000 to create computer software that can tell jokes.
–$40,000 for ten trash bins.
-$1.6 million to irrigate a golf course inTexas.
-Thousands of dollars to replace – twice – a sidewalk “that doesn’t front any homes or businesses, and leads into a ditch”
–300 truckloads of oyster shells.
Bonus non-stimulus spending: “[T]he Census spent $23,000 on a totem pole in Alaska. Census representative Hector Maldonado says the agency thought it was a great idea. The plan was to increase participation in Alaska, but despite the totem pole, participation dropped in the state by two percent from the last census.”
$150,045 of stimulus money is being spent to restore a bridge that doesn’t connect to any roads and ends in an 8-foot drop.
Stimulus backers claim that the project created 1.9 jobs. That’s $78,971.05 per job created. That’s not a very good deal. Especially considering that no jobs were created on net, because that $150,000 was taken away from somewhere else in the economy.
Without the stimulus, that money would have been spent in other ways. Given that most jobs cost less than $78,971 to create, it may well be that the bridge restoration project meant fewer jobs were created than if the government had just left the money where it was originally — your pocket.
–$1.6 million in stimulus money to be used to irrigate a golf course in Texas.
-A new study by Susan Dudley and Melinda Warren finds that regulatory spending grew 31 percent under Bush. Regulatory staffing grew 42 percent.
-Selling shellfish to the Department of Veterans Affairs? There are regulations for that.
-It is illegal to possess pliers in the state of Texas.
-The federal government’s Integrated Nitrogen Committee is having a public teleconference on June 8.
-In Virginia, it is illegal to take a bath without a doctor’s permission.
-Government programs never die. One Cold War relic is the Federal Radiological Preparedness Coordinating Committee.
-The federal government’s Wild Horse and Burro Advisory Board is holding a public workshop June 14-15.
–$300,000 of stimulus money to pay for floating toilets.
Posted in regulation
Tagged bush. president bush, cold war, department of veterans affairs, federal radiological preparedness coordinating committee, floating toilets, george bush, george w. bush, golf, golf course, integrated nitrogen committee, irrigate, links, melinda warren, pliers, regulation, regulation roundup, regulatory spending, relic, shellfish, spending, Stimulus, susan dudley, texas, toilets, va, waste, weidenbaum center, wild horse and burro advisory board
Not at all, to be honest. For starters, the very notion of stimulus violates basic economics. Taking money out of the economy and then putting it back in has no net effect. But it gets worse. Much worse.
When that money is put back into the economy, it goes to the weirdest places — $3.4 million is going to Florida to build a tunnel under U.S. Highway 27, so turtles can cross safely. A fish hatchery in South Dakota is getting $20,000 for new light fixtures. $50,000 is being spent to resurface a tennis court in Bozeman, Montana.
And so on.
These boondoggles aren’t getting nearly enough press. To help fill the vacuum, the good folks at Citizens Against Government Waste have put up a new website, MyWastedTaxDollars.org. Click on over and check it out. The best feature is an interactive map that shows just how unwisely stimulus funds are being spent all over the country.
Stimulus is worse than a zero-sum game. It is actively harmful. It is government saying that it knows how to spend your money better than you do; stimulus is the ultimate act of hubris. Kudos to CAGW and MyWastedTaxDollars.org for providing hundreds of examples of why government hubris should be replaced with government humility.
Posted in Economics, Stimulus
Tagged basic economics, boondoggle, bozeman, bozeman montana, cagw, citizens against government waste, Economics, fl, florida, florida tag, government waste, hatchery, montana, mt, mywastedtaxdollars.org, opportunity costs, sd, south dakota, Stimulus, stimulus package, turtles, waste