Supporters of the health care bill spend a lot of time attacking health insurance companies.
The health care bill, by the way, would legally require people to give a lot of money to those same insurance companies. A lot of money. It would be the largest corporate gift Washington has ever given out — as much as $1.5 trillion over ten years by one estimate.
Health insurers’ loudest detractors are actually their best friends, and they don’t even seem to realize it. Apparently, regulatory capture is not always a conscious process.
Posted in Health Care
Tagged Health Care, health care bill, health care reform, health insurance, health insurance companies, health insurance mandate, insurance, lobbyists, obama, pro-business, trillion
The Editor, New York Times
229 West 43rd St.
New York, NY 10036
To the Editor:
Much as I enjoy conservative-bashing, I was disappointed in Paul Krugman’s October 5 column, “Conservatives Are Such Jokers.” He almost reflexively assumes that people who disagree with him have checkered motives. He comes off as reluctant to argue policies on their merits, in this case the SCHIP children’s health insurance program.
Why so quick to question his opponents’ motives? SCHIP opponents have put forward arguments that are either right or wrong. Motives have nothing to do with whether those arguments are right or wrong.
SCHIP opponents don’t like the program because they don’t think it will improve childrens’ health outcomes. The disagreement is a question of means, not ends. Does anyone actually favor having sicker children?
While Mr. Krugman clearly favors expanding the SCHIP program, he doesn’t really say why. I invite him to make his case – on the merits.
Posted in Argumentation, Correspondence, Economics, Health Care, Philosophy, The Partisan Mind
Tagged children, childrens health insurance, Health Care, health insurance, insurance, paul krugman, schip