Ryan Young
Senior fellow at the Competitive Enterprise Institute. All opinions here are my own, and not necessarily CEI’s.
Questions? Comments? Send me an email.
Follow me on Twitter – @RegoftheDay
-
Join 217 other subscribers
Twitter Feed
- RT @ceidotorg: The Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) published a new monograph today by writer-in-residence Kevin D. Williamson. Che… 2 hours ago
- RT @AlexNowrasteh: “The Fiscal Impact of Immigration in the United States” - new Cato paper. 248-pages about the fiscal effects of immigra… 4 hours ago
- 5 proposed regulations, 13 final regulations, 93 agency notices in today's 273-page Federal Register. 6 hours ago
- For the #NeverNeeded files. twitter.com/AidanRMackenzi… 18 hours ago
- 4 proposed regulations, 10 final regulations, 120 agency notices in today's 337-page Federal Register. 1 day ago
Archives
Categories
- #NeverNeeded (48)
- Books (529)
- CEI Podcast (197)
- Correspondence (36)
- Economics (1,261)
- Antitrust (117)
- Bailouts (21)
- Business Cycles (42)
- Competition (35)
- Development Economics (13)
- Minimum Wage (37)
- Monetary Theory (50)
- Price and Wage Controls (22)
- Price Gouging (2)
- Public Choice (135)
- Spending (128)
- Stimulus (59)
- Taxation (72)
- The Market Process (40)
- Trade (271)
- education (19)
- Everybody Panic (14)
- Executive Power (12)
- Export-Import Bank (52)
- Financial Regulation (4)
- Free Speech (40)
- Fun with Statistics (10)
- General Foolishness (153)
- Great Thinkers (117)
- Health Care (43)
- History (182)
- Housekeeping (40)
- Immigration (51)
- Inequality (14)
- inflation (6)
- Innovation (44)
- institutions (3)
- International (155)
- labor (26)
- Law (89)
- Literature (58)
- Media (43)
- Media Appearances (174)
- modernity (6)
- Nanny State (118)
- nationalism (5)
- Philosophy (173)
- Argumentation (26)
- Certainty (20)
- Pith (48)
- Political Animals (358)
- Predicting the Future (9)
- prohibition (9)
- Psychology (5)
- Publications (165)
- Reform (25)
- regulation (858)
- Regulation of the Day (235)
- Science (92)
- Security Theater (93)
- Sports (150)
- Technology (89)
- The Arts (26)
- Music (15)
- The New Religion (108)
- Mankind's Doom (24)
- The Old Religion (14)
- The Partisan Mind (64)
- Transparency (2)
- Uncategorized (568)
Blogroll
Al's Ramblings (Brewers Blog)
Radley Balko (The Agitator)
Caleb Brown
Cafe Hayek
Cato Institute Blog
Coordination Problem (Peter Boettke, Pete Leeson, Steve Horwitz, et al)
William Easterly
EconLog (Bryan Caplan, David Henderson, Arnold Kling)
Jacob Grier
Gene Healy
Steven Landsburg
Jeremy Lott
Megan McArdle
Chris Moody
Carl Oberg
Open Market (CEI)
Tom Palmer
Reason Hit & Run
Jason Vines
Tag Archives: wealth of nations
Individualism Doesn’t Mean Isolationism
Comments Off on Individualism Doesn’t Mean Isolationism
Posted in Economics, Philosophy
Tagged adam smith, daily kos, Don Boudreaux, individualism, wealth of nations
The Wealth of Nations Turns 235
Adam Smith’s An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations was published 235 years ago today.
Over at Cafe Hayek, Russ Roberts links to a few short resources about that long, long book (which I nonetheless recommend reading). Worth checking out.
Comments Off on The Wealth of Nations Turns 235
Posted in Economics, Great Thinkers, Philosophy
Tagged adam smith, cafe hayek, russ roberts, wealth of nations
What “International Tax Harmonization” Means
“There is no art which one government sooner learns of another, than that of draining money from the pockets of the people.”
-Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations, p. 929.
Comments Off on What “International Tax Harmonization” Means
Posted in Books, Economics, Great Thinkers, Taxation
Tagged adam smith, tax harmonization, Taxation, taxes, wealth of nations
A Bit of Smithian Wisdom
“[T]he law ought always to trust people with the care of their own interest, as in their local situations they must generally be able to judge better of it than the legislature can do.”
-Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations, Book IV, Ch. 5.
This sentence must have had a tremendous influence on Hayek’s thought.
Adam Smith on Lotteries
In many places, lotteries are the only legal form of gambling. And even then, only the government is allowed to run them. This may be because lottery profit margins are often 30 percent or more. Casinos average about 5 percent. Lotteries are the worst possible deal for gamblers.
Why do people still play lotteries, then? It’s because humans have an inherent cognitive bias to overestimate the odds of success, and underestimate the odds of failure. This is a useful cognitive defect, because it encourages risk-taking. It was evolutionarily useful back in our hunter-gatherer days. And it remains so today; there would be far less entrepreneurship if people saw odds more clearly. But there are drawbacks. Lotteries are among them.
I didn’t know there were state-run lotteries in 1776, but apparently there were, because Adam Smith explains what a bad deal they are in The Wealth of Nations:
The world neither ever saw, nor ever will see, a perfectly fair lottery; or one in which the whole gain compensated the whole loss; because the undertaker could make nothing by it. In the state lotteries the tickets are not really worth the price…
Many people think that buying more tickets improves one’s odds of winning. But Smith saw that this was not a wise strategy:
There is not, however, a more certain proposition in mathematics, than that the more tickets you adventure upon, the more likely you are to be a loser. Adventure upon all the tickets in the lottery, and you lose for certain; and the greater the number of your tickets the nearer you approach to this certainty.
(Adam Smith, An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, 124-25.)
Posted in Economics, Great Thinkers
Tagged adam smith, bias, cognitive bias, lotteries, probability, state lotteries, wealth of nations