As noted previously, ladies’ night bar specials are illegal in Minnesota. The state’s Department of Human Rights says they are unfair gender discrimination. But they’re still legal in New York.
That upsets attorney Roy Den Hollander. He thinks ladies’ nights are unconstitutional. So he sued several New York bars. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals wisely threw out his case. Even more wisely, they chose not to take him seriously:
The court, with evident amusement, said it must rule against Den Hollander even though “without action on our part, (he) paints a picture of a bleak future, where ‘none other than what’s left of the Wall Street moguls’ will be able to afford to attend nightclubs.”
It’s not often that New Yorkers show more common sense than Midwesterners. Minnesota’s solons should take heed.
Posted in Nanny State, regulation, Regulation of the Day
Tagged bars, gender discrimination, ladies night, lawsuit abuse, minnesota, Nanny State, new york, roy den hollander, second circuit, Second Circuit Court of Appeals, unconcstitutional
Ladies’ night bar specials are illegal in Minnesota. They are unfair gender discrimination, according to the Minnesota Department of Human Rights.
Of course, few of the people actually affected by this blatant discrimination have a problem with it. Women save money on drinks. Men who buy women drinks save money. And by increasing the female-to-male ratio, ladies’ nights make men happy for other reasons.
If anything, enforcing the ladies’ night ban is a waste of state resources at a time when Minnesota is facing a severe budget crunch.
So why are regulators bothering? Blame lawyers. A separate case in New York has brought publicity to this divisive issue:
New York attorney Roy Den Hollander has for years made his living filing gender discrimination complaints for men, including himself.
Who cares? He does.
“[Men] have to pay more for the services [clubs] offer just because an accident of nature made them one sex or another?” he said. “That’s the basis of discrimination, and it shouldn’t be allowed.”
Or Mr. Hollander could simply choose to patronize bars that don’t do ladies’ nights. Other people seem to enjoy that particular form of gender discrimination. Let them.
Posted in Regulation of the Day
Tagged bars, discrimination, gender discrimination, human rights, ladies night, lawyers, minnesota, minnesota department of human rights, Nanny State, regulation, Regulation of the Day, roy den hollander