Over at the AmSpec blog, I describe a kerfuffle in Germany over schnitzel taxes:
Gerhard Kaltscheuer owns a restaurant in a working-class neighborhood in Hammerbruecke, Germany. His schnitzels are especially popular — except with German tax authorities.
It goes downhill from there.
It is illegal to home-school your children in Germany. Even so, German parents Uwe and Hannelore Romeike believe home-schooling will give their children a better education than sending them to a school. So they pulled their children out of school, hoping the law would not be enforced.
They were wrong. The New York Times lists what they were threatened with:
[F]ines eventually totaling over $11,000, threats that they would lose custody of their children and, one morning, a visit by the police, who took the children to school in a police van. Those were among the fines and potential penalties that Judge Burman said rose to the level of persecution.
Facing the facts, the family decided to pack up their belongings and move to Morristown, Tennessee.
A Memphis judge recently granted the family asylum so they could remain in the U.S., and so they can educate their children the way they see fit.
The Romeikes’ troubles are not over, however. Immigration and Customs Enforcement is appealing their grant of asylum. It is unclear why the agency would do such a thing. Neither Mr. nor Mrs. Romeike pose a threat to national security. They are not criminals. They are not a drain on the economy; Mr. Romeike earns an honest living as a piano teacher.
American parents don’t have much in the way of educational choice. But it does appears they do have more than German parents do. Immigration and Customs Enforcement should stand up for the Romeikes’ rights.
(Hat tip: Megan McLaughlin)
Posted in education, Immigration, Regulation of the Day
Tagged asylum, educational choice, Germany, Hannelore Romeike, homeschoolers, homeschooling, icf, Immigration, immigration and customs enforcemnet, ins, new york times, romeike, romeike family, school choice, Uwe Romeike