CEI Podcast for June 6, 2013: Making Passenger Rail Affordable

amtrak car
Have a listen here.

Fellow in Land-use and Transportation Studies Marc Scribner discusses a new CEI study arguing that regulations make passenger train cars unnecessarily expensive.

Two Decades of Regulatory Growth

Over at The American Spectator, Wayne Crews and I marvel at how much the regulatory state has grown over the last twenty years. We also offer up a few ideas for reform:

One is an independent Regulatory Reduction Commission, modeled after the successful Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Commission of the 1990s, which trimmed billions of dollars’ worth of unneeded military spending. Every year, this commission would comb through the books for old, obsolete, harmful, and redundant rules. It would then submit an annual repeal package to Congress for a prompt up-or-down vote with no amendments allowed. This would prevent vote-trading along the lines of “I’ll vote to save your favorite regulation if you vote to save mine.”

The Regulatory Reduction Commission would continue to submit repeal packages every year for as long as necessary.

Read the whole thing here.

Rent-Seeking Watch: Former Rep. Jason Altmire

Back when he was a congressman, Jason Altmire (D-PA) bucked his own party and voted against the Affordable Care Act. He left office earlier this year and now works for a health insurance company in Florida. Seeing as the law legally requires people to buy his employer’s product, he unsurprisingly now supports the law.

The Median Voter Theorem Explained

There is a good reason for the time-tested presidential election strategy of candidates taking relatively progressive or conservative positions during the primaries, and then moving to the center for the general election. It’s because the way to win an election is to appeal to the median voter. In a partisan primary, that median voter is relatively ideological. But in a general election, the median voter is centrist.

This is the median voter theorem, and it plays a key role in understanding how politicians behave during election season. It explains why the two parties can be so hard to tell apart — they’re chasing after the same voter. Utah State University economics professor Diana Thomas ably explains the median voter in this short Learn Liberty video (click here if the embed doesn’t work):

George Will on Ten Thousand Commandments

If anything good came out of the Bush 43 years, it’s that his two-term onslaught of spending, deficits, regulation, and rapid government growth finally disabused many people of the notion that the GOP will actually enact limited-government policies. It was during this time that George Will, who had long vacillated between Hamiltonian and Madisonian phases throughout his career, rediscovered his inner James Madison. If anything, he has become even more classically liberal during the Obama years. That’s why I was especially pleased that in his latest column, he praises CEI’s own Wayne Crews and the new edition of Ten Thousand Commandments:

Wayne Crews of the Competitive Enterprise Institute has recently published his “Ten Thousand Commandments: An Annual Snapshot of the Federal Regulatory State.” This year’s 20th-anniversary edition notes that regulation, the “hidden tax,” costs almost $2 trillion not counted among the official federal outlays. Using mostly government data, Crews concludes:

The cost of regulations ($1.806 trillion) is now more than half the size of the federal budget and 11.6 percent of GDP. This costs $14,768 per U.S. household, equal to 23 percent of the average household income of $63,685. Regulatory compliance costs exceed the combined sum of income taxes paid by corporations ($237 billion) and individuals ($1.165 trillion). Then add $61 billion in on-budget spending by agencies that administer regulations.

Crews’s “Anti-Democracy Index” measures “the ratio of regulations issued by agencies relative to laws passed by Congress.” In 2012, the index was 29, meaning that 29 times more regulations were issued by agencies than there were laws passed by Congress. “This disparity,” Crews writes, “highlights a substantial delegation of lawmaking power to unelected agency officials.”

The entire column is well worth reading. See also a recent Wall Street Journal editorial on Ten Thousand Commandments, and, of course, the study itself.

CEI’s Battered Business Bureau: The Week in Regulation

mini cotton bale
This week in the world of regulation:

  • During the holiday-shortened week, 61 new final regulations were published in the Federal Register. This is down from 68 new final rules the previous week.
  • That’s the equivalent of a new regulation every 2 hours and 45 minutes — 24 hours a day, seven days a week.
  • All in all, 1,427 final rules have been published in the Federal Register this year.
  • If this keeps up, the total tally for 2013 will be 3,449 new final rules.
  • Last week, 1,162 new pages were added to the 2013 Federal Register, for a total of 32,928 pages.
  • At its current pace, the 2013 Federal Register will run 78,400 pages.
  • Rules are called “economically significant” if they have costs of $100 million or more in a given year. No such rules were published last week, for a total of 13 so far in 2013.
  • The total estimated compliance costs of this year’s economically significant regulations ranges from $5.58 billion to $10.19 billion.
  • So far, 102 final rules that meet the broader definition of “significant” have been published in 2013.
  • So far this year, 254 final rules affect small business; 23 of them are significant rules.

Highlights from final rules published last week:

For more data, go to TenThousandCommandments.com.

CEI Podcast for May 30, 2013: The Politics of Caffeine

cup-of-coffee
Have a listen here.

The Food and Drug Administration recently announced plans to investigate, and possibly regulate, caffeine consumption. Fellow in Consumer Policy Studies Michelle Minton prefers separation of food and state.

Regulatory Opacity

In today’s Investor’s Business Daily, Wayne Crews and I make the case that one of the biggest obstacles to regulatory reform is a lack of agency transparency. It’s hard to fix a problem if you’re unable to even diagnose it properly. Here’s a taste:

Politicians from both parties routinely tout the need to roll back unnecessary regulations. But how much overregulation is there exactly? Most politicians have no idea, and neither does the general public.

Most people have some idea that the government spends nearly $4 trillion annually given the prominence of the recent debates over the “fiscal cliff” and “sequestration.”

But there is no equivalent regulatory metric. This is a problem that needs fixing.

Agencies aren’t exactly forthcoming with data about how much their rules cost, since bureaucrats’ sinecures depend at least in part on avoiding public outrage. The documents they do issue are widely scattered and rarely written in language accessible to the lay reader.

In short, the regulatory state has a major transparency problem.

Read the whole thing here.

Slow News Day

Hen
New Group Forms to Oppose Backyard Hens in Arlington

More than Taxing and Spending

The cost of government is far more than it taxes and spends. Regulatory costs count, too. One of our biggest jobs here at CEI is to make that point. As long as the regulatory state continues to grow, this becomes more important with each passing year. Fortunately, the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review’s editorial board agrees, as they opined yesterday:

The Competitive Enterprise Institute ( cei.org) says that regulating rather than legislating pays for programs with private-sector resources rather than tax dollars. CEI says regulation is “off-budget taxation” — and business owners, workers and families ultimately foot the bill through higher taxes and/or lower wages.

CEI’s new 20th-anniversary edition of its “Ten Thousand Commandments: An Annual Snapshot of the Federal Regulatory State” estimates yearly compliance costs at $1.8 trillion — exceeding half of total federal expenditures for the first time, as well as Canada’s or Mexico’s GDP. And at $14,678 per family, red tape trails only housing among typical household costs.

Read the whole thing here. See also the Wall Street Journal’s take here, and the new Ten Thousand Commandments report here.