Category Archives: regulation

CEI’s Battered Business Bureau: The Week in Regulation

This week in the world of regulation:

  • Last week, 38 new final rules were published, down from 88 the previous week. Note that it was a short work week due to the Columbus Day holiday.
  • That’s the equivalent of a new regulation every 4 hours and 25 minutes — 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
  • All in all, 2,987 final rules have been published in the Federal Register this year.
  • If this keeps up, the total tally for 2012 will be 3,823 new rules.
  • Last week, 1,187 new pages were added to the 2012 Federal Register, for a total of 62,322 pages.
  • At its current pace, the 2012 Federal Register will run 78,690 pages.
  • Rules are called “economically significant” if they have costs of $100 million or more in a given year. The 40 such rules published so far in 2012 have compliance costs of at least $17.4 billion. Two of the rules do not have cost estimates, and a third cost estimate does not give a total annual cost. We assume that rules lacking this basic transparency measure cost the bare minimum of $100 million per year. The true cost is almost certainly higher.
  • No economically significant rules were published last week.
  • So far, 296 final rules that meet the broader definition of “significant” have been published in 2012.
  • So far this year, 565 final rules affect small business; 83 of them are significant rules.

Highlights from final rules published last week:

For more data, go to TenThousandCommandments.com.

The Missing Transparency: Where’s the Unified Agenda?

Some stories don’t get the press they deserve. When it comes to government transparency, it is essential to throw at least some sunlight on the problem. Over at the Daily Caller, Wayne Crews try to do just that:

Every spring and fall, as certain as the turning of the seasons, the General Services Administration’s Regulatory Information Service Center (RISC) issues a new edition of the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions. Or it did, until this year. Published in the Federal Register around April and October of every year, the Unified Agenda is one of the more important transparency measures we have for keeping an eye on federal regulations (available online at RegInfo.gov). In it, rulemaking agencies disclose what rules they have at various stages of the regulatory pipeline, along with rules likely to move in the near future.

The problem is that it’s now October, and neither the spring nor the fall 2012 editions of the Unified Agenda have been published. The most recent edition we have is that of fall 2011, and even that was published late.

This might not be a particularly sexy issue (hence the lack of coverage), but it’s very important. The Unified Agenda is one of the most important transparency measures that we have for keeping an eye on regulations.

Read the whole thing here.

Regulations Lower Manufacturing Output

An unsigned editorial in today’s Investor’s Business Daily describes the impact that federal regulations have on the manufacturing sector. The picture isn’t pretty; a new American Action Forum report estimates that they lower total output from 2 to 10 percent. Along the way, the writers also cite this week’s Battered Business Bureau post:

The Competitive Enterprise Institute tells us that the federal government churned out last week a new regulation at the rate of one every hour and 55 minutes.

By the end of this year, the bureaucratic machine will have produced 3,868 new regulations spread out over 78,783 pages of the federal register.

Fact of the Day

While researching for a project I’m working on, I learned that from 1999-2011, the EPA passed 4,995 new regulations. That’s an average of 384 per year — more than a regulation per day.

CEI’s Battered Business Bureau: The Week in Regulation


Just another week in the world of regulation:

  •  88 new final rules were published last week, up from 71 the previous week.
  • That’s the equivalent of a new regulation every 1 hour and 55 minutes — 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
  • All in all, 2,949 final rules have been published in the Federal Register this year.
  • If this keeps up, the total tally for 2012 will be 3,868 new rules.
  • 1519 new pages were added to the 2012 Federal Register last week, for a total of 61,135 pages.
  • At its current pace, the 2012 Federal Register will run 78,783 pages.
  • Rules are called “economically significant” if they have costs of $100 million or more in a given year. The 40 such rules published so far in 2012 have compliance costs of at least $17.4 billion. Two of the rules do not have cost estimates, and a third cost estimate does not give a total annual cost. We assume that rules lacking this basic transparency measure cost the bare minimum of $100 million per year. The true cost is almost certainly higher.
  • One economically significant rule was published last week.
  • So far, 296 final rules that meet the broader definition of “significant” have been published in 2012.
  • So far this year, 563 final rules affect small business. 83 of them are significant rules.

Highlights from final rules published last week:

  • Last week’s economically significant regulation only costs an estimated $5.232 to $6.832 million. That’s because, as an anti-bioterrorism regulation, its estimated benefits are automatically estimated in the billions of dollars, well exceeding the $100 million threshold for economic significance. As always, I have used the lower $5.232 million figure for this year’s running compliance cost tally.
  • If you want to volunteer for the federal government’s Senior Companions or Foster Grandparents programs, or for AmeriCorps, you will now have to undergo a “fingerprint-based FBI criminal history check.”
  • The federal government has an Interstate Telecommunications Relay Service Fund to help people with speech and hearing disabilities use telephones. A new rule published on Thursday aims to reduce the amount of fraud and abuse in the program.
  • If you are planning on fishing for silky sharks, read this new regulation first.
  • The Federal Energy Regulation Commission has revised page 700 of FERC Form No. 6.

For more data, go to TenThousandCommandments.com.

Regulatory Reform: A Winning Debate Issue

I missed most of yesterday’s debate. My wife and I thought it would be more intellectually stimulating to see a play about professional wrestling instead. After reading some of the coverage this morning, we were right.

The main reason is that both candidates missed the opportunity to talk about one of the most important issues facing America today: regulation. In a piece that ran yesterday over at Fox Business, Wayne Crews and I try to tell both candidates that regulatory reform is a winning issue not just for economic recovery and innovation, but with voters:

In this election, voters are paying more attention than usual to the broader issue of the size and role of government. Interestingly, a growing segment of the public seems to believe that government is too big and tries to do too much. And one of the biggest vehicles for government growth is regulation. On Wednesday, President Barack Obama and Republican candidate Mitt Romney would do well to acknowledge that fact with a bit more than the usual lip service…

Transparency resonates with voters across the political spectrum. In short, measuring and controlling regulation can be a winning issue. It would be nice to hear one (or both!) of the candidates acknowledge as much on national television.

Read the whole thing here.
Fortunately, there are still two presidential debates left. Hopefully President Obama and Governor Romney will see fit to discuss this important issue during at least one of them.

Regulating outside the Rules

The federal regulatory process is a complicated thing. As with any complex body of law, there are loopholes that agencies can exploit. Over at the Washington Times, Wayne Crews and I point out three of these loopholes, and kindly suggest that Congress close them.

The first is “sue and settle.” Agencies like the EPA work closely with environmental and other pressure groups that sue targeted employers or states over some grievance to force a settlement, opening what our Competitive Enterprise Institute colleague William Yeatman aptly describes as “EPA’s New Regulatory Front.” Litigation is costly. Companies routinely settle to avoid protracted court battles, and settlement terms usually force compliance with the goals of the EPA or the allied interest group.

The second option, involving what are called guidance documents, is less opaque, but no lovelier. Agencies issue these to clarify rule interpretations when there is confusion. As the House oversight panel report explains: “Guidance documents, while not legally binding or technically enforceable, are supposed to be issued only to clarify regulations already on the books.” Guidance documents can be helpful, since many regulations are so poorly written that they border on incomprehensible.

Some guidance documents exceed mere helpful clarification. The committee report continues: “However they are increasingly used to effect policy changes, and they often are as effective as regulations in changing behavior due to the weight agencies and the courts give them.”

If the first two options aren’t available, agencies have a third way to regulate outside the rules: good old-fashioned emergency powers. The APA contains a loophole that allows agencies to avoid the public comment period and make final rules effective on their publication date during an emergency, as determined by the agency itself.

Read the whole thing here.

Slow News Day

BBC News: Man freed after getting his head stuck in bin in Aberdeen

The article’s picture of this Scottish Homer Simpson is priceless.

CEI’s Battered Business Bureau: The Week in Regulation


Just another week in the world of regulation:

  •  71 new final rules were published last week, down from 82 the previous week.
  • That’s the equivalent of a new regulation every 2 hours and 22 minutes — 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
  • All in all, 2,861 final rules have been published in the Federal Register this year.
  • If this keeps up, the total tally for 2012 will be 3,850 new rules.
  • 968 new pages were added to the 2012 Federal Register last week, for a total of 59,616 pages.
  • At its current pace, the 2012 Federal Register will run 78,858 pages.
  • Rules are called “economically significant” if they have costs of $100 million or more in a given year. The 39 such rules published so far in 2012 have compliance costs of at least $17.4 billion. Two of the rules do not have cost estimates, and a third cost estimate does not give a total annual cost. We assume that rules lacking this basic transparency measure cost the bare minimum of $100 million per year. The true cost is almost certainly higher.
  • No economically significant rules were published last week.
  • So far, 285 final rules that meet the broader definition of “significant” have been published in 2012.
  • So far this year, 547 final rules affect small business. 78 of them are significant rules.

Highlights from final rules published last week:

For more data, go to TenThousandCommandments.com.

CEI Podcast for September 27, 2012: The Future of Generic Biotech Crops


Have a listen here
.

Senior Fellow Greg Conko discusses his new paper, “Is There a Future for Generic Biotech Crops? Regulatory Reform Is Needed for a Viable Post-Patent Industry.” Patents will soon expire for several popular biotech crops, opening the way for cheaper generic versions. But because, unlike prescription drugs, biotech crops have to be re-approved every few years, the future of generic biotech crops is very much in doubt. Conko recommends getting rid of re-approval requirements to put them on the same footing as other products.