Category Archives: Political Animals

Good Men Don’t Become President

The nature of politics is to turn good men into bad ones. The ardors of campaigning are also enough to deter most normal, decent people from seeking office. That’s a major reason why, as Hayek put it, the worst get on top. Over at the Daily Caller, I explore this theme in a little more detail:

[W]hat sane person would want a job that destroys your privacy, makes it impossible for you to go out on the street, subjects your family to intrusive media scrutiny, forces you to watch everything you say, and drives some people to want to take a shot at you? Apparently someone who feels that the power that comes with the office is worth the attendant indignities.

Read the whole thing here.

Slow News Day

Politico with another great non-story: Poll: Swing states could still swing

Should the Government Track Your Political Activity?

Former FEC Commissioner Brad Smith asks an important question in this short video. Click here if the embed doesn’t work.

The Conventions Continue


Last week I pointed out that the GOP and Democratic nominating conventions will cost taxpayers as much as $136 million, and to little effect. This week the political duopoly begins the second half of its festivities. With both sides still bleating their talking points past each other, I was reminded of a startlingly relevant quotation all the way back from 1815. It appears on page 411 of Benjamin Constant’s Principles of Politics Applicable to All Governments:

When a nation is shallow and imitative, it finds nothing more powerful than editorial slogans. They are short, they seem clear, they are inscribed easily in the memory. Cunning men throw them to fools who seize them, because they are thus spared the trouble of thinking. They repeat them, because this gives them the appearance of understanding. Hence it arises that propositions whose absurdity astonishes us when they are analyzed, slip into a thousand heads and are repeated by a thousand tongues, such that one is endlessly reduced to proving what is obvious.

I’m not just picking on Democrats here. The GOP has the same problem, and to the same degree. There are a lot of reasons why such a base strategy is politically successful. One is rational ignorance; people have better things to do than dissect the fineries of policy.

Another is tribalism. If Homo sapiens has been a species for one million years, then we have lived in small tribes of 150 people or so for nearly 99.9 percent of our history, up until the agricultural revolution a little more than 10,000 years ago. After all, for most of our species’ history, other tribes were just as likely to steal from or kill members of your tribe as they were to share a meal or become friends. That’s why a wary, us-versus-them mindset is in our blood. People have a natural tendency to identify with one political tribe and vilify the other one.

Substance gets lost in the resulting vitriol. Any rock, down to the tiniest pebble, must be hurled at the hated Other. Even if you miss, you feel better about yourself simply for having thrown it.

It may be only two months until the election, but it feels like so much longer than that. What to do, then? Leading up to the election and beyond, independent voices need to keep pointing out the parties’ fiscal and regulatory excesses, as well as ways to reform them. It takes some repetition, but if we keep at it someone will listen.

The Other Side Must Not Win

I’m a bit late to this, but here is a brilliant bit of satire from A. Barton Hinkle:

The past several weeks have made one thing crystal-clear: Our country faces unmitigated disaster if the Other Side wins.

No reasonably intelligent person can deny this. All you have to do is look at the way the Other Side has been running its campaign. Instead of focusing on the big issues that are important to the American People, it has fired a relentlessly negative barrage of distortions, misrepresentations, and flat-out lies.

I dare you to read the whole thing and not smile.

Conventions Cost Taxpayers Up to $136 Million

Neither party has much to offer, but they do have a lot to take. And so it appears that their nominating conventions this week and next will cost taxpayers as much as $136 million.

Voters have known for a while who the candidates will be, and most have already made up their minds, defeating two of the three reasons to have a convention in the first place.

The third, party solidarity, is important. A party with low morale and little enthusiasm isn’t going to do well in the polls. But independents like this writer shouldn’t be on the hook for the political equivalent of trust fall exercises. Nor should Democrats be paying for the GOP’s convention, and vice versa.

Slow News Day

Politico: @PaulRyansMom is not Paul Ryan’s mom

Twitter strikes again.

The Remaining 10 Percent Had Never Heard of Congress, or Are Members

Politico: Congress hits bottom: Only 10 percent approve

The Kids Are Alright

Interesting article in today’s New York Times. It’s well established that the under-30 crowd is far more tolerant than its elders on social issues such as marriage. It’s a big reason — the main reason, I’d argue, along with image — why young people are overwhelmingly Democratic.

Republicans, faced with losing millions of potential customers, are starting to adapt. Candidates and organizers are actively avoiding talking about social issues, or sometimes even changing their stances on social issues. In short, we are witnessing the slow death of social conservatism. While I do question the younger set’s economic policy acumen, they are doing a world of good by making intolerant people be a little nicer to their fellow man. The kids are alright.

Time to Reform Unfunded Mandates

When deficits are high, Congress has even more incentive than usual to indulge in unfunded mandates. That way it can deliver the spending programs and other government goodies that voters like, and without adding to the deficit. Of course, this is because states and the private sector bear the burden instead.

Congress passed an Unfunded Mandate Reform Act back in 1995, but it is mostly toothless, and needs to be strengthened. Fortunately, help may be on the way, as Wayne Crews and I explain in today’s Washington Times:

During the last week of July and just before August recess, the House is likely to vote on H.R. 4078, a package of reforms called the Regulatory Freeze for Jobs Act of 2012.

Title IV of the package is H.R. 373, the Unfunded Mandates Information and Transparency Act of 2011, a bipartisan bill long championed by Rep. Virginia Foxx, North Carolina Republican. It would close some of UMRA’s loopholes. The biggest fix is that it would force independent agencies to comply with UMRA.

Another reform is that the Office of Management and Budget would no longer review the rules. That task would move to OMB’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, which specializes, albeit imperfectly, in cost estimates. That office likely is better suited to the job, given a long history of being tasked with regulatory review responsibility, but it doesn’t have much veto power.

Read the whole piece here. Our colleague David Deerson has also blogged about unfunded mandate reform here and here.