Category Archives: Great Thinkers

Right Headline, Wrong Reasons

Bush says Congress putting US in danger

He’s right, but not for the reason he thinks:

“No man’s life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session.”
-Mark Twain

Religion and Decency

Some people believe faith is necessary for decency. Some think it hinders it. The truth is far more nuanced, but here’s a pithy example of one skeptic’s point of view:

“If a man needs a religion to conduct himself properly in this world, it is a sign that he has either a limited mind or a corrupt heart.”

Ninon de Lenclos

On the Succession of Kings, and Ron Paul

Back when monarchy was en vogue, most people favored an ironclad, hereditary succession. This prevented “a periodic invitation to anarchy,” as historians Will and Ariel Durant put it.*

Presidential elections in the United States seem to have disproved this hypothesis. Even in the most hotly contested elections, anarchy has not ensued. Just low approval ratings in polls.

Does this mean that people are more docile these days?

Hear me out. Recall the assaults on the Bill of Rights in recent years. The PATRIOT Act. The War on Drugs. The War on Terror. McCain-Feingold. Eminent domain abuse. The TSA. The list goes on.

What popular uprisings have sprung up to protest these intrusions on our rights? The Ron Paul R3VOLution?

Oh, bother.

(* Will and Ariel Durant, The Age of Reason Begins, p. 627)

Lessons from History

“Adjustment to a changing environment is the essence of life, and its price.”

-Will and Ariel Durant, The Story of Civilization, Vol. 7: The Age of Reason Begins, p. 332

Speaking of Rousseau…

Rousseau is something of an intellectual godfather to today’s environmental movement. This is a shame; his philosophy was vicious and anti-human to its core.

Like Locke, he thought that man in the state of nature was basically good. Locke also thought man was better off in civil society than in the state of nature.

Rousseau, on the other hand, thought man better off in nature than in civil society. He denounced civilization itself and had a distaste for any technology, even as fundamental as fire, fishhooks, or bows and arrows.

His ideal man was solitary, meeting others only as necessary for procreation. Higher thought was to be avoided, as it may lead to dangerous ideas like property rights and civilization. Rousseau’s ideal man isn’t much different from any other animal, except that some primates and birds are known to use tools.

Despite all this, Rousseau chose to live most of his life in major cities such as Paris, Geneva, and Venice.

Nobody, not even Rousseau, denies the material and medical benefits of civilization. Knowing all this, he still placed humanity beneath his personal ideal of nature. People still believe this today; the more hardcore environmentalists advocate technological regress, and would gladly pay the price of a lower standard of living.

This also assumes that progress and technology are bad for the environment; not so.

Most people who consider themselves environmentalists haven’t thought this through. They should. This new religion of theirs can be dangerous for our health.

I’m No Anarchist, But…

“The State is said by some to be a ‘necessary evil;’ it must be made unnecessary.”

-Benjamin Tucker

Partisanship

“The partisan, when he is engaged in a dispute, cares nothing about the rights of the question, but is anxious only to convince his hearers of his own assertions.”

-Plato, Phaedo.