Monthly Archives: February 2009

Power, Always Power

Tonight I picked up a book that has been sitting on my shelf for some time, taunting me: Peter Heather’s The Fall of the Roman Empire. Heather has a crisp, easy to read prose style, lightened by occasional flashes of dry wit. The subject matter is of interest, at least to this old history major. Good book.

There’s a sentence early on (p. 19) that made my mind wander to the stimulus package currently before our own Senate.

Disclaimer: I have a dim view of the stimulus. But I don’t see it as an existential threat to society. Thousands of years from now, when some future historian writes The Fall of the American Empire, I doubt that the word “stimulus” will appear in its pages.

All Congress and the President are doing is slowing down the economy temporarily. A bad thing, yes. The decline of our civilization? No.

Why the connection to Rome’s decline, then? Heather speaks to something that doesn’t change a whole lot across time or space: human decency. His simple, profound sentence reads, “Ancient Roman society held that you should not attempt to control others until you could control yourself.”

Ignore that “Ancient Roman society” part. It doesn’t much matter. The bit about control does. At heart, the stimulus is an assertion of control. That’s why it came to mind so readily. Congress is saying, “we know how to run the economy better than the people do. Therefore we will.”

Yet Congress cannot control itself. President Obama’s hopes for a clean bill have proven futile. Billions of dollars in pork projects are making the stimulus even worse for the economy than a clean version.

Congress really must learn to control itself before it attempts to control others. Decency demands it.

Least Objectionable Legislator Awards: Bipartisan Edition

CEI’s Wayne Crews occasionally bestows “Least Objectionable Legislator” awards when Congress critters do good things. I have two nominations of my own, one Democratic and one Republican.

The Democrat is Rep. Jim Cooper of Tennessee. At a previous job I had the opportunity to occasionally work with him and his staff. I found him to be more open-minded than most partisans, and more willing to buck his party leadership when he thinks they are in the wrong.

He gets his award for his recent remarks about the stimulus. President Obama wants a “clean” bill, meaning free of earmarks and other trickery; the House version of the stimulus is decidedly unclean.

Rep. Cooper has publicly taken Obama’s side, and voted against the bill. Leadership is furious. He is sticking to his guns, possibly at great professional cost. Well done, Rep. Cooper.

The Republican nominee is Sen. Tom Coburn of Oklahoma. He has been a thorn in the side of both parties for years. Not only is he adamantly anti-pork, he is crafty enough to use Senate rules to make his point as irksomely as possible.

Sen. Coburn also co-sponsored the bi-partisan Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006 with then-Sen. Obama. It created USAspending.gov, which attempts to make it easier for the public to track where federal taxpayer dollars are spent.

The stimulus contains the largest earmark ever: $2 billion for FutureGen Industrial Alliance, Inc, of Illinois. Recall that the “Bridge to Nowhere” earmark that led to the end of Sen. Ted Stevens’ career cost barely one tenth that.

Sen. Coburn has offered an amendment to eliminate this earmark from the bill. But that’s not all. Another Coburn amendment “would prohibit any funding provided by the stimulus bill to be spent on casinos, museums, golf courses, stadiums, parks, or highway beautification projects.” The stimulus is supposed to create jobs; such projects don’t.

Coburn’s amendments usually fail. I expect the same fate of these latest Coburn amendments. But at least he’s trying; most members couldn’t be bothered.

Congratulations, Rep. Cooper and Sen. Coburn. Keep up the good work.

Objective Journalists

A man was arrested today for jumping a ropeline and asking President Obama for his autograph.

You guessed it – he’s a reporter.

Kind of surprising this hasn’t happened before, given the tenor of much presidential media coverage.