Monthly Archives: February 2009

Oink, Oink

My Congressman, Jim Moran, has a penchant for pork; I’d rather he didn’t. The omnibus bill that Congress recently passed contains $53 million of Rep. Moran’s goodies. The list is here.

Perhaps “goodies” is a misnomer. Some of the projects are better handled by state and local governments. There’s no need for federal involvement in, say, Gang Prevention Services in Alexandria ($250,000), or restoring the Jones Point Lighthouse ($640,000).

$53 million may be less than a rounding error in today’s spending bills — not to mention deficits.. It’s still a lot of money. If it were left in the hands of taxpayers to spend as they see fit, who knows how many jobs would be created? $53 million can support a lot of livelihoods.

Instead, Rep. Moran sees pork projects as vote-getters. We’ll never know what might have been. Similar stories are playing out in districts across the country.

Rough Toilet Paper, Soft Science

The kerfuffle over soft toilet paper has hit a new low. The NRDC’s Allen Hershkowitz is now saying that “People just don’t understand that softness equals ecological destruction.”

I had to chuckle after reading that last sentence (it is silly, is it not?). But then I decided to take Hershkowitz seriously. Hardcore environmentalists like the NRDC are sometimes loosey-goosey with scientific data; science and their religion rarely get along.

Let’s see how big the impact of softer toilet paper really is. Maybe, hyperbole aside, Hershkowitz has a point. Let’s look at the data and find out.

Despite the proliferation of tree-intensive soft toilet paper, forest area in the U.S. has remained almost unchanged over the last century. Right around 33% of total land area.

Over that same time period, U.S. population more than tripled. That’s a lot more bottoms, demanding ever softer toilet paper. And yet — no net deforestation.

That doesn’t sound like ecological destruction. To use one of the New Religion’s buzzwords, that sounds… sustainable.

Deforestation is happening on a worldwide scale, according to a handy table from the Earth Policy Institute (data from the UN). They try to make it sound scary, but it isn’t. I crunched the numbers. The decline amounts to roughly 0.2% per year. Not exactly a crisis. Even that slow rate appears to be in decline.

I’m going to go ahead and say that Hershkowitz and the NRDC are promoting a baseless scare story.

There is still a tremendous upside to all this hemming and hawing. If toilet paper is all that environmental activists have to get worked up over these days, it is a sign that, environmentally speaking, we live in good times.

Soft Toilet Paper: Mankind’s Doom

Soft toilet paper is bad for our forests, says the New York Times:

“No forest of any kind should be used to make toilet paper,” said Dr. Allen Hershkowitz, a senior scientist and waste expert with the Natural Resource Defense Council.

Don Boudreaux points out, “It’s ironic, is it not, that this report appears in a newspaper?”

I swear, these people are their own reductio ad absurdum.

The Durants on Democracy

Will and Ariel Durant are two of my favorite writers. Perceptive, pithy, and always eloquent, they only rose in my esteem when they described democracy as merely “a count of noses after a contest of words.” (The Age of Napoleon, p. 286)

Couldn’t have said it better myself.

Quotation of the Day

From the opinion page of today’s Miami Herald:

There’s a reason that English is the most widely spoken language on the planet: It’s the most highly adaptable, capable of evolving to meet new needs in the blink of an eye. For example: Just last year, offering mortgages at a cheaper-than-market teaser interest rate with little or no money down was known as “predatory lending.” But conditions changed—specifically, the party occupying the White House—and now we call that style of lending “national policy.”

Hat tip to Reason’s Nick Gillespie.

Actions Reveal More than Words

Hugo Chavez kicked a diplomat out of Venezuela for calling him a “dictator.”

Only a dictator would deport a man for calling him names.

All the Best, Brett

The American Spectator Online ran my take on Brett Favre’s latest retirement.

Stimulating Lobbyists

It’s well established by now that the stimulus won’t be stimulating much of anything.

Turns out one sector of the economy is better off – the lobbying industry. The Hill reports:

After a tough 2008 in which revenues at top firms fell, the stimulus package has been a boon to K Street’s economy. Hundreds of firms, companies and trade groups registered to lobby on the recovery package this January, usually a sleepy month in Washington.

Good for them, I guess. Too bad for the rest of us.

The Census Approaches

Reps. Darrell Issa and Patrick McHenry write that the census should be free of politics, and I completely agree. Life would be better if most things were free of politics.

Wishing won’t make it so, sadly. The census determines House seat redistricting. It also helps direct where billions of dollars worth of federal goodies are spent.

The census allocates power and money, in other words. Of course it’s going to be politicized!

Brett Favre Retires Again

Brett Favre is done playing football. For good this time, thinks Peter King.

It sure was weird seeing him in a Jets uniform. People often asked if I felt any bitterness. Some Packer fans do. But not this one. I’ll always cheer for Brett Favre, I’d say.

I meant it, too. As with his playing career, so after it. Here’s hoping Brett enjoys retirement, and that he finds a new calling. Something that he’s as passionate about as he is with football.

Bonus self promotion: Here is an article I wrote the first time Brett retired, and here is one I wrote when he un-retired.