Madison, WI is considering banning restaurant drive-throughs. Why? Global warming, of course.
Sometimes the new religion is its own reductio ad absurdum.
Madison, WI is considering banning restaurant drive-throughs. Why? Global warming, of course.
Sometimes the new religion is its own reductio ad absurdum.
Comments Off on Restaurant Drive-Throughs: Mankind’s Doom?
Posted in Mankind's Doom, The New Religion
An environmental group just ran a study that says that shower curtains, of all things, are bad for your health. They “may lead to adverse health effects including respiratory irritation, central nervous system, liver and kidney damage, nausea, headaches and loss of coordination.”
I was surprised to see this. Maybe it’s because I haven’t heard of shower curtains causing any of these symptoms in people. Anywhere. Ever.
ABC News was kind enough to call their bluff. “only one shower curtain — not one brand; one curtain — was subjected to complete testing for chemicals in its composition, as well as those it released into the air.”
The study also neglects the cardinal rule of toxicology: it is the dose that makes the poison. As it turns out, the chemicals detected in the curtains “could be toxic if swallowed or inhaled only in quantities thousands of times greater than those found.”
Usually media outlets eat up this kind of scaremongering with a spoon. Kudos to ABC News for taking the time to check the facts.
Self promotion: I’ve written on a similarly baseless scare story before.
Hat tip: Fark.com
Comments Off on Shower Curtains: Mankind’s Doom
Posted in Mankind's Doom, The New Religion
Seattle might ban beach bonfires because they contribute to global warming.
The new religion practices its faith in strange ways.
Comments Off on Beach Bonfires: Mankind’s Doom
Posted in Mankind's Doom, The New Religion
Happy Earth Day, everyone. Some thoughts were provoked by a timely piece by Patrick Moore, a co-founder of Greenpeace. He writes about why he left the organization.
Moore is a scientist, trained in the scientific method. He doesn’t have what I call The Certainty. His colleagues did. They were more rigid, more ideological. More Certain.
The breaking point came when, over Moore’s objections, Greenpeace tried to ban chlorine, which is an element on the periodic table.
Moore laments, “the initial healthy skepticism hardened into a mindset that treats virtually all industrial use of chemicals with suspicion.”
That hardened mindset is The Certainty. It is environmentalism’s ugly side. It turns it into a religion.
We all know that religion can bring joy and comfort to people. But when The Certainty shows itself, religion becomes something darker.
The environmental movement is the same way. It is wonderful that activists have raised awareness. People prefer a clean environment to a dirty one, and sure enough, look at the data. Our environment is cleaner than it was fifty years ago. What a noble achievement.
Then The Certainty came in. Trying to ban this or that chemical without evidence of harm. Advocating technological regress. Attacking those with fact-based disagreements as corporate puppets, without ever touching the substance of their arguments.
There’s a reason why I think of (radical) environmentalism as the new religion. Like religion, environmentalism has done some good. But like religion, the more radical adherents have The Certainty. That can, quite literally, be bad for our health.
Posted in Certainty, Philosophy, Science, The New Religion
Fields made of artificial turf are being investigated as health hazards because some of them contain lead. New Jersey has taken an early lead in overreacting by closing two fields.
This would be a cause for concern if there were signs of lead poisoning in people using the fields. But there is no evidence of even a single player getting lead poisoning.
It’s the dose that makes the poison. That dose just isn’t there in the fields.
A spokesman said, “In the 40 years that synthetic sports turf has been in use in the United States and around the world, not one person has ever reported any ill effects related to the material composition of the fibers.”
It really irks me when media outlets frighten people with scare stories like this. Now a government investigation is wasting peoples’ time and tax dollars because of it.
Comments Off on Astro Turf: Mankind’s Doom
Posted in Certainty, Economics, Mankind's Doom, Science, The New Religion
The President is announcing today a new intiative on climate change.
Politically, this is great news for Democrats. If passed, the President’s proposals would slow down the economy. They would also do little to reduce CO2 emissions.
When this becomes apparent, Democrats can blame Republicans for enacting failed policies. This despite the fact that many of those policies originated with Democrats.
Politics is a dirty business, isn’t it?
Comments Off on Bush Shifts Stance on Climate Change
Posted in Political Animals, The New Religion
Further along in the survey I mentioned in the previous post, there is a section that asks students which actions we are currently taking to reduce our CO2 emissions. One of them is very strange:
Eating lower on the food chain (i.e., less meat, more plant-based foods)
Am I reading too much into this, or is there possibly a larger agenda of some kind behind this?
Comments Off on More on Universities and Climate Change
Posted in The New Religion
George Mason University, where I am currently studying economics, “will be taking steps to ultimately eliminate or offset CO2 emissions from all sources associated with university operations including electricity, heating, commuting, and air travel.”
In a student survey where we can raise questions or concerns, I asked: “Will the benefits be higher than the costs? Will it raise fees and tuition? Are there other uses of Mason’s limited resources that would do more good? The University should have answers to those questions before it proceeds.”
All I’m saying is look before you leap.
Comments Off on Universities and Climate Change
Posted in Economics, The New Religion
The Department of Labor recently opened a new office building in San Francisco. There is no heating or air conditioning, and the elevators only stop at every third floor.
Obviously, the workers in the building are not happy. Maybe their employer is violating some of its own standards?
Now, “green” architecture sounds like a good idea in principle. But if this is any indication of the current state of the art, I’ll pass.
Comments Off on Green Buildings and Labor Conditions
Posted in The New Religion
Over at the New York Times, John Tierney looks at the state of the global warming debate. He points out that those who hold non-mainstream views are usually dismissed as corporate shills.
This is a shame; people have put forward arguments that are either right or wrong. Funding sources have nothing to do with whether those arguments are right or wrong.
Many people think they’re wrong. It would be nice to know why, instead of who underwrites their research. Who cares? There are much bigger fish to fry here.
We know the Earth is getting warmer, and there’s a high probability that humans have something to do with it. Beyond that, we still have a lot to learn. We have yet to conclusively determine whether the net effects will be good or bad. Will it be better to adapt to a changing world, or to try to stop that change altogether? Those are big questions, and we don’t know the answers yet.
So let’s get to finding them out. Demonizing people who disagree with us is, to be frank, a waste of time.
Comments Off on A Cooler Perspective on the Global Warming Debate
Posted in Argumentation, Philosophy, The New Religion