Category Archives: Political Animals

Campaign Slogans

Giuliani is on Fox right now. The background behind him bears the slogan “Tested. Ready. Now.”

The Long-Suffering Girlfriend points out that this sounds more like a slogan for a prescription drug than a candidate.

CNN’s Iowa Coverage

On the tv, CNN is using pie charts to show each candidate’s vote share within their party. On the GOP chart, we see slices for Huckabee, Romney, Thompson, McCain… and a large blank spot where Ron Paul’s 10% should be. Also missing is Giuliani’s 4%. Over on the Dem side, Bill Richardson’s 2% slice is clearly visible.

Fox has a pro-big-government conservative slant, so their recent slight of Ron Paul wasn’t too unexpected.

CNN has a center-left bias, so one wonders if Paul and Giuliani’s slices are left blank so their names get less screen time.

UPDATE: Never mind that conspiracy theory rubbish. More likely, the graphic was programmed to only display the top four candidates, regardless of vote totals.

Obama, Richardson in Cahoots?

I’ve thought for a while that the Democratic ticket would be Obama-Richardson.

Obama and Richardson might think that, too. The Politico is reporting that their campaigns have some sort of vote-trading arrangement, which of course they vigorously deny.

Interesting.

Update: CNN has more.

Iowa

Who knows who’s going to win tonight in Iowa? Just for fun, here are my predictions.

Dems – Obama wins, with Clinton in 2nd and Edwards in 3rd.

GOP – Romney wins, with Huckabee in 2nd and Fred Thompson in 3rd.

I’ll be rooting for Bill Richardson and Ron Paul to do well, since they seem to me the least bad candidates from each party.

Once the primary dust settles, I expect an Obama/Richardson ticket going against Romney/Huckabee, and a Democratic victory.

The fun starts in about an hour.

Somebody Has Thin Skin

The Washington Post‘s Chris Cillizza reports that Barack Obama believes that people who criticize him and praise his opponents “raise real questions about those candidates’ commitment to serious reform of the political process.”

Now, I like Obama – at least as much as I can like any political creature. He seems to be the least bad top-tier Democratic candidate. He also seems more benign than Mitt Romney or Rudy Giuliani.

But this is pathetic. If he doesn’t like speech that criticizes him, then he should counter it with more speech. Instead, he’s telling his critics to shut up.

No criticizing me!

This is a free country. We, the people, shall say what we please about any candidate.

It’s right there in the First Amendment: “Congress shall pass no law… abridging the freedom of speech.”

Sadly, I fear that Obama might actually have a valid legal case under current law, should it come to that. This reflects broken, unconsitutional laws, not Obama’s righteousness. This is to our shame as a nation, and as a democracy.

Congress shall pass no law.

Couldn’t be simpler.

Brave Stances

John Edwards has come out as the “anti-poverty candidate.”

Does this mean the other candidates are pro-poverty?

On the Succession of Kings, and Ron Paul

Back when monarchy was en vogue, most people favored an ironclad, hereditary succession. This prevented “a periodic invitation to anarchy,” as historians Will and Ariel Durant put it.*

Presidential elections in the United States seem to have disproved this hypothesis. Even in the most hotly contested elections, anarchy has not ensued. Just low approval ratings in polls.

Does this mean that people are more docile these days?

Hear me out. Recall the assaults on the Bill of Rights in recent years. The PATRIOT Act. The War on Drugs. The War on Terror. McCain-Feingold. Eminent domain abuse. The TSA. The list goes on.

What popular uprisings have sprung up to protest these intrusions on our rights? The Ron Paul R3VOLution?

Oh, bother.

(* Will and Ariel Durant, The Age of Reason Begins, p. 627)

DNC Endorses Huckabee

The ever-reliable Drudge Report says the DNC views Huckabee as “an easy kill” in the general election. Therefore they want him to be the GOP nominee, and will refrain from attacking him in the primary cycle.

Brilliant move, I say. He’s economically liberal and socially conservative, which is the least popular political philosophy in America these days. Then there’s his nanny-statist streak. This bodes well for the Dems. Most people are either liberal or conservative across the board. Recent research says that most of the remainder is consistently anti-government — economically conservative and socially liberal.

The smallest group is Huckabee’s, which is consistently pro-government.

You’re not going to get a candidate endorsement from this blog since I don’t like any of ’em. To be crass, one of my guiding principles is that all politicians are whores (I admit to a few noble exceptions).

I will say that, on the GOP side, I probably agree with Huckabee the least. If he does win the nomination, he deserves an electoral drubbing.

Congress to Cut Back Work Week

The Politico reports that Congress will largely abandon the new five-day workweek that Speaker Pelosi implemented this year.

I think I like this development. The less they’re in session, the less damage they can do. Right?

Doing Good vs. Looking Good

E.J. Dionne’s latest column praises Maryland governor Martin O’Malley. It begins:

Imagine a place where the leading politician pokes fun at those who “regard all taxes as a pestilence, a plague or a disease.”

Imagine the same politician saying: “Not one of us wants to pay more in taxes. But you know what we want even less? What we want even less is to leave our country to our kids in a worsened condition.”

O’Malley probably thinks he looks Pragmatic and Moderate. That will get him Votes, which are a politican’s lifeblood. Forgive me then, for being more concerned with being correct than popular.

O’Malley gives us a choice here between keeping taxes low and bettering the country – for the children, natch. It is a false choice.

Look at some of Maryland’s new spending initiatives the tax increase will fund: more money for health care. More money for education. Transportation. Environmental cleanup. Wonderful things all. But O’Malley is choosing the wrong means for pursuing these ends.

For example, Maryland has some lousy public schools, especially in Baltimore. But giving them more money literally rewards their failure. This problem is systemic; the solution then is to get government out of the education business. Even if it isn’t Pragmatic or Moderate.

And we’ve all heard the stories about how well government health care intiatives work – they don’t. And when something doesn’t work, you should stop doing it. Even if it costs you Votes.

Someone should tell Governor O’Malley that it is better to do good than to look good. Cut spending. The $550m in cuts this year is a good start, even if it’s negated by other increases. After spending is down and the deficit is under control, cut taxes. The children will thank you for it later.