Category Archives: Political Animals

House Passes AMT Relief… Again

The Alternative Minimum Tax is almost universally hated. It’s basically a second tax code. If your income is high enough, you have to do your taxes twice. Once under the normal tax code, and again under AMT rules. Then you pay whichever is higher.

That’s bad enough. But Congress didn’t index the AMT for inflation when they enacted it in 1969. Almost forty years later, that means as many as 30 million people are subject to AMT. Some of them have incomes as low as $40,000.

This is where Congress gets a chance to look good. Every year, without fail, they pass an AMT relief bill. By sparing over 20 million people the hassle of doing their taxes twice, they earn voters’ gratitude.

Why don’t they just pass a one-and-done permanent AMT repeal or reform? That would be much easier.

Passing a patchwork bill every year means Congressmen get to hold more press conferences and talk to more reporters. It gives voters an annual reminder that their representative is looking out for them. It’s better for getting Votes. That’s why fundamental, permanent AMT reform is unlikely to happen.

Politics is a loathesome business.

Everglades for VP?

Florida Governor Charlie Crist just announced a $1.7 billion restoration program for the Everglades.

Given the timing, it sure sounds like somebody wants Sen. McCain to give him the VP nod.

Approval Ratings

Congress has an 89% disapproval rating.

What are the other 11% thinking?

Hat Tip: Andy Roth

Obama Now a NAFTA Supporter

Now that the primaries are over, Sen. Barack Obama has come out in favor of NAFTA. He told Fortune in an interview that “Sometimes during campaigns the rhetoric gets overheated and amplified.”

I’ll say. On the campaign trail he has called NAFTA both “devastating” and “a big mistake.” He also threatened to unilaterally opt out of NAFTA for six months as a prelude to reopening negotiations.

The U.S. economy has added 26 million net jobs since NAFTA took effect in 1994. Inflation-adjusted worker compensation is up 23%.

Obama’s qualified support of free trade is a welcome change. But it makes clear an unfortunate reality. His earlier rhetoric was either misinformed, or intentionally deceitful.

Neither is an appealing characteristic for a potential President.

A Specter Stops Haunting the NFL

The NFL’s Spygate scandal has disappeared from the headlines. Coincidentally, Sen. Arlen Specter (R-PA) has announced that he won’t hold hearings on the matter. I’ve been worried that he would.

There is a cloud in this silver lining, though: “Instead, he said he plans to look into another hot-button issue where sports and politics meet: public financing of sports stadiums.”

It never ends.

A New Regulatory Order?

Harvard economist Larry Summers has some ideas for a new regulatory order in the Financial Times. In typical Summers fashion, his recommendations are moderate. His moderation comes at the cost of ignoring incentives.

His first principle is “no regulatory competition.” Regulators shouldn’t compete against each other. Let’s take this principle to its logical conclusion. Only one regulator would be allowed — that would be the federal government. As with most monopolies, bad incentives abound.

It is a good thing that, say, investment firms are free to move to New Jersey if New York’s regulations are too stringent. Or if taxes are too high; the same arguments apply to tax competition. “Forum shopping” gives regulators more incentive to be reasonable.

Summers also expresses concern over regulatory capture. His concern is legitimate, but there’s no correlation with forum shopping, as he implies. Regulatory capture happens when something is regulated. The only way to stop regulatory capture is to stop regulating, period.

When constructing a regulatory order, we have three choices: 1) no regulators, 2) a single regulator (the federal government), and 3) multiple, competing regulators (the states).

I think I know which I prefer. Failing that, I’ll take the third option.

FCC to Nullify Millions of Contracts?

My colleague Alex Harris is drooling over the latest version of Apple‘s iPhone. In true CEI spirit he added, “Regulators better not get in my way.” Sorry to say, Alex, but tomorrow the FCC is holding a hearing that may do just that.

Here’s what’s happening. Monthly service is cheap, but phones themselves are expensive. A good one costs hundreds of dollars. Many people can’t afford to buy them outright, or don’t want to. Since phone companies want to sell phones, they’ve found a way around that: spread the cost out over time.

Providers often sell their phones cheaply, sometimes even at a loss. Then they make their money back by locking the customer in for a set period of time, usually a year or two. If the customer wants out before then, they have to pay an early termination fee.

The FCC ‘s hearing tomorrow will discuss ways to regulate early termination fees. The fees are unpopular, even though they allow more people to afford better phones.

Some people have complained because they found out about the fees only after signing a legally-binding contract; not everyone can be bothered to read fine print. The FCC claims it is looking out for these people.

They are not. The fees are a good thing. They lower the cost of entry into the cell phone market. Without early-termination clauses, a lot of people would be priced out of cell phone ownership, period. Others would only be able to afford a low-end phone. The FCC’s proposals would hurt these people.

That doesn’t matter when there’s a chance to be seen “doing something.” Ergo, the FCC is considering violating the sanctity of millions of contracts. In Washington, good publicity trumps the rule of law. I wish it were for a better reason than people not reading what they sign.

Let’s Move Election Day

CNN’s Roland Martin thinks that elections should be held on Saturdays, not Tuesdays. He thinks that would increase turnout.

I have a better idea. Move Election Day to Tax Day — April 15. We can decide who gets to spend our money while our tax bills are still fresh in our minds. Politicians would have less incentive to come up with grandiose schemes for spending other peoples’ money.

Besides, I’ve always thought it borderline suspicious that elections are held at the opposite end of the calendar from when we pay our taxes.

A Bit Late, I Think

Rep. Dennis Kucinich has introduced a resolution to impeach President Bush, whose term expires in seven months.

Kucinich’s other achievement this year is demanding a recount of the New Hampshire presidential primary, where he won 1.4% of the vote.

More politicians should devote themselves to wasting their colleagues’ time like Rep. Kucinich does. The floor time he took up reading the proposed impeachment is time Congress didn’t spend “stimulating” the economy. Kudos to you, sir.

The Crime of Disagreeing


This is what happens to people who disagree with Robert Mugabe. The man in the picture is Morgan Tsvangirai. He is the leader of Zimbabwe’s opposition party, the Movement for Democratic Change. In March of last year he was arrested and beaten for the crime of favoring different policies than Mugabe.

In recent elections Tsvangirai’s MDC took over the parliament. He is also probably the rightful President; he almost certainly beat Mugabe in the election. Zimbabwe is not known for fair elections, though. Tsvangirai still has to go through a run-off election against Mugabe in June.

The Washington Post reports that Tsvangirai just returned home after spending seven weeks abroad for safety reasons. Inflation is now estimated at over one million percent. The economy is in shambles. People are starving. Let us hope that Tsvangirai stays safe, even if he has different ideas than Robert Mugabe.