Category Archives: History

Edward Wilson-Lee – The Catalogue of Shipwrecked Books: Christopher Columbus, His Son, and the Quest to Build the World’s Greatest Library

Edward Wilson-Lee – The Catalogue of Shipwrecked Books: Christopher Columbus, His Son, and the Quest to Build the World’s Greatest Library

Christopher Columbus was not the only interesting person in his family. His son Hernando was also both accomplished and flawed. He also assembled what was probably the world’s largest library at the time. This book gets its title from 1,200 volumes of that library that were lost at sea. Hernando knew his father’s place in history, and as a youth even accompanied him on his fourth voyage. Hernando would also take his own voyage to Hispaniola later in life.

Hernando saw himself as a caretaker of the family legacy. He played a role in downplaying Christopher Columbus’ mysticism and other bizarre beliefs, as well as the degree to which Columbus misunderstood his discoveries. Hernando also played a large role in publishing and editing Columbus’ autobiography, which would shape popular history for centuries. Bartoleme de las Casas, one of my historical heroes and author of A Short Account of the Destruction of the Indies, also plays a role in this story. He and Hernando did not get along.

Edwards-Lee intermingles this history, and Hernando’s role in it, with Hernando’s private life as a book collector, librarian, and scholar. This allows Edwards-Lee to delve into the history of printing, how different ways to organize libraries can help or hinder different kinds of research, and even compares different cataloging systems to early search engines (Hernando lived before Google).

This book is a hybrid of Hernando Columbus’ biography, the history of early transatlantic exploration, and a book about books. It’s a little disjointed both in scale and in subject matter, but is still an enjoyable slice of history.

Stephen Davies – The Wealth Explosion: The Nature and Origins of Modernity

Stephen Davies – The Wealth Explosion: The Nature and Origins of Modernity

In some ways, I have been waiting on this book for 20 years. When I was college age, I saw Davies give several historical lectures at Cato University seminars, read numerous articles by him, and have met him a few times over the years at various events. This book captures his big-picture thoughts on world history. Why is the world so rich today compared to ancient or medieval times? Davies’ answer is similar to Deirdre McCloskey, but not quite the same: cultural attitudes towards openness and change, plus compatible politico-economic institutions are what did it.

But it’s not so simple as that. Nothing is in history. The arrow of causality runs in both directions. Guns, germs, and steel played a role, and so did geography. There are also several instances where a modern takeoff began, but couldn’t sustain itself. There were flowerings of various degrees in China, Japan, Peru, Africa, and Europe, but none of them stuck until 19th century England. Davies argues that there is nothing special about Europe or its people that made it destined to be the place where a modern wealth explosion first sustained itself and spread throughout the world. But Enlightenment ideas, in combination with the many, many other factors listed above, seem to be what did it.

Davies’ other contribution is a proper understanding of what modernity is. It is not a thing or a place, or even a certain set of technologies, or amount of wealth, or percentage of urban dwellers. Modernity is a process. Better players don’t make a better game; people are the same today as we were back in Caesar’s day. But better rules make a better game, as do the players respecting those rules and knowing their importance. Institutions, and the people working within them, need to prefer neophilia to neophobia. They need to be tolerant of people different from them, whether that’s religion, race, appearance, or numerous other characteristics. People who do not go along will not get along—and if political institutions do not encourage or allow people to act civilized, very often they will not.

Davies’ view of world history is unusually humble. He knows enough to know he doesn’t know everything. He doesn’t give a single magic bullet cause for modernity because there isn’t one. It is multicausal, and even then, modernity relies on having an ongoing process in place, not this or that outcome.

As important, he reminds the reader that the culture and institutions behind that process are fragile and reversible. They must be defended.

Alec Nevala-Lee – Astounding: John W. Campbell, Isaac Asimov, Robert A. Heinlein, L. Ron Hubbard, and the Golden Age of Science Fiction

Alec Nevala-Lee – Astounding: John W. Campbell, Isaac Asimov, Robert A. Heinlein, L. Ron Hubbard, and the Golden Age of Science Fiction

Pairs well with Howe’s Marvel Comics: The Untold Story. This is the first proper biography of John W. Campbell, a publisher, editor, and sometimes writer during science fiction’s golden age. He was the glue that held together the various major personalities as they transitioned from fanboys to young pulp writers to major authors. Campbell mostly stayed in the background, which is why name is not well known, but he was an important figure in the genre. Asimov, Heinlein, and Hubbard also get the biographical treatment.

None of them come off well in their treatment of women, even by the standards of the time. Campbell was too hard-living for his own good, and his marriage and his life both ended before they should have. The young Asimov was shy and virginal, though by the time he reached middle age his grabby hands were so bad that even dedicated chauvinists had to give him multiple talking-tos about his behavior toward the few female fans sci-fi had at the time. Heinlein was the best of the lot, though even he had multiple marriages, including a distant and dysfunctional first marriage. He would improve his behavior and his matchmaking skills later in life. Hubbard was an all-around horrible human being, even leaving aside Scientology. He was sexually and physically abusive, and once kicked a pregnant girlfriend in the stomach with the worst of possible intentions. He was also an inveterate liar, making up both white lies and personal exaggerations even when he didn’t have to.

Science fiction didn’t have a dominant publisher or promoter the way comics did with Marvel and DC; its business model was much more individualistic, mirroring the ethos many of those authors promoted in their stories. Where Howe’s Marvel book is a story of ongoing evolution, Nevala-Lee’s story arc is more like an individual life, with youthful idealism and early success leading to excess, consequences, and a quieter final act.

Sean Howe – Marvel Comics: The Untold Story

Sean Howe – Marvel Comics: The Untold Story

I’ve been interested in corporate histories recently, from Ron Chernow’s books on Rockefeller and Morgan to modern biographies of Steve Jobs and Jeff Bezos. This is another one from that pile, though it also served the ulterior motive of familiarizing me with the Marvel Universe’s universe of characters in advance of seeing Avengers: Endgame. My Marvel fandom is decidedly casual, and I am unfamiliar with many of the characters’ origins and backstories. Adding to the confusion is that they are all interconnected in a larger universe.

This book also gives some background on just how much those characters and their universe reflect their time and place, from 1940s pulps to the national fascination with anything atomic in the 1950s and 1960s. The characters change and grow as the times do, and so does Marvel itself, which has frequently had to fend off bankruptcy as it periodically falls behind the times.

The company has been bought and sold several times over the years, and personalities clashes abound as art and commerce collide. Stan Lee turns his attention to Hollywood and being an ambassador of comics. Co-creator Jack Kirby gets nowhere near the credit he deserves, is stiffed financially, and leaves Marvel for its rival, DC Comics. Other writers also get screwed over, leading to a growing movement of independent companies.

As comics buyers grew up and had kids of their own, Marvel also had to add new titles, drop old ones, reboot stale characters that still had compelling attributes, and change its approach to hold onto its customers, and attract new ones. Progress is this department has been uneven at best; the comics world still isn’t exactly friendly territory for women or minorities, and some of the more hardcore fans are a little stunted—though they would likely still be that way had comic books never been invented. The companies slowly began to realize the goldmines they were ignoring, but many of their attempts are cringe-worthy. Things are better than they used to be, but this stunted male juvenile aspect of the business remains a work in progress.

This book is part business history, part explainer of the Marvel Universe, and part cultural history of 20th century America. That’s an ambitious scope for any book, but Howe pulls it off. He might have done a bit more on the business side, but this reader has no serious complaints. As with the best Marvel stories, I was entertained and educated at the same time.

Dan Jones – The Wars of the Roses: The Fall of the Plantagenets and the Rise of the Tudors

Dan Jones – The Wars of the Roses: The Fall of the Plantagenets and the Rise of the Tudors

An utterly conventional kings-and-battles account of the period. It’s a good survey of the period, but readers will have to go elsewhere if they want memorable portraits of the personalities involved, what everyday life was like in castle or court, or for the soldiers and their families, what the period’s economy and technology were like, what intellectual or religious life were like, or even the larger historical significance of the York-Lancaster rivalry.

Inequality in History

Catherine the Great, Empress of Russia, had a personal allowance of one thirteenth of national income, per p. 292 of Robert K. Massie’s Catherine the Great: Portrait of a Woman.

By way of context, this would be equivalent to about $2.7 trillion per year in the modern United States. This annual income is more than the combined lifetime fortunes of Silicon Valley’s wealthiest entrepreneurs. While that mathematical ratio isn’t particularly interesting, from an ethical standpoint it is crucial that Catherine did not earn this income by creating value for others. She took it away from them in a zero-sum game.

Today’s entrepreneurs gain wealth by creating value for others in exchange–about 50-fold more than their own earnings, by William Nordhaus’ estimate. Rent-seeking remains a significant problem, but fortunately is less severe than in Catherine the Great’s time.

Today’s economy has much room for improvement, but reformers on all sides would benefit from taking stock of how much things have improved over the last few centuries, and why.

David Salsburg – The Lady Tasting Tea: How Statistics Revolutionized Science in the Twentieth Century

David Salsburg – The Lady Tasting Tea: How Statistics Revolutionized Science in the Twentieth Century

A history of the discipline of statistics that I found immensely useful. Rather than memorizing by rote what a p-statistic is or what regression does, this book tells the stories behind them. Salsburg tells the why and the how, rather than explaining the what and being done with it. Salsburg tells the stories of the people who invented modern statistical techniques and concepts, their historical context, why their innovations were needed, what types of problems they were built to solve, and what their techniques’ drawbacks and limitations are, as well as their positives. This book was recommended by Michael Munger, who heads Duke University’s Philosophy, Politics, and Economics (PPE) program, and I am glad I listened.

Edward Dolnick – The Clockwork Universe: Isaac Newton, the Royal Society, and the Birth of the Modern World

Edward Dolnick – The Clockwork Universe: Isaac Newton, the Royal Society, and the Birth of the Modern World

A look at the 16th-century Scientific Revolution as one of the founding processes of modernity, with a special focus on England and the Royal Society. Pairs well with much of Joel Mokyr’s work on how cultural attitudes affect technological progress. Dolnick’s book is narrower in focus and not as rigorous, but it is more accessible, and provides a good look at the Republic of Letters, though its England-heavy focus doesn’t fully capture the scientific movement’s cross-national and cross-religious character. Dolnick could also have done more on the Scientific Revolution’s greater historical context. Its secular, cosmopolitan, and dynamist outlook built upon earlier Renaissance and Reformation thought, or at least their more liberal strains. At the same time, the Scientific Revolution was a necessary practical predecessor to the more philosophical Enlightenment that flowered in the 18th century in Scotland, France, America, and elsewhere. A useful book, but more of a sketch than a full-fledged investigation of the beginnings of modernity.

Ron Chernow – The House of Morgan: An American Banking Dynasty and the Rise of Modern Finance

Ron Chernow – The House of Morgan: An American Banking Dynasty and the Rise of Modern Finance

More of a corporate history than a history of the Morgan family. But this 1990 book, Chernow’s first, also chronicles the evolution of banking and finance from the Industrial Revolution up to about the 1980s. I picked this up due to an interest in antitrust law, competition, and the rise of big business. While this book is ultimately more useful for financial regulation scholars, I still found it useful. And though its characters are not as compelling as Chernow’s Rockellers in Titan, it is an enjoyable read.

Stephen Greenblatt – The Swerve: How the World Became Modern

Stephen Greenblatt – The Swerve: How the World Became Modern

This book-about-a-book is a colorful history of Lucretius’ On the Nature of Things with the larger purpose of shedding light on the origins of modernity. Lucretius argued for a materialist view of science and philosophy that has far more in common with modern thought than with early Christian doctrine.

Perhaps not coincidentally, On the Nature of Things was nearly lost for nearly a millennium. During this long post-Roman dormant period, Lucretius was occasionally copied by monks and forgotten by the secular public. But a nascent humanist movement led to a growing number of book-hunters interested in finding and reviving old texts.

This movement eventually became the Renaissance, and Lucretius was unknowingly one of its leading intellectual inspirations. As far as afterlives go, Lucretius has had a good one.

Greenblatt writes well, and his accounts of the early humanist bookhunters and their interactions with disinterested monks in their monasteries are particularly vivid, though the contrast between the two camps was probably not quite as dramatic as he portrays it. He also has a good eye for the big picture, and traces the arc of Lucretius’ influence over an impossibly long timeframe. If you ever doubt the power of books, Greenblatt puts up a strong affirmative case.

The Swerve would pair well with Christpher Krebs’ similar but rather darker A Most Dangerous Book: Tacitus’s Germania from the Roman Empire to the Third Reich.