Category Archives: Economics

The Quantity Theory of Money

While writing an op-ed, I came up with a good way to explain the quantity theory of money, which is the primary explanation for how inflation happens. But I had to edit it out for space reasons. Fortunately, a blog is the perfect repository for such things, so I share it here:

I am about six feet tall. But suppose I would rather be ten feet tall! There are two ways to do this. One is to actually grow taller. The other is to change the value of a foot so that it takes ten of them to describe my height instead of six. The first option is akin to economic growth; the second is essentially height inflation. Devaluing the foot so that it takes more of them to describe the same amount of height is the same as using more dollars to describe the same amount of wealth. This is what economists call the quantity theory of money. It doesn’t operate in the real world quite so smoothly as it does on the blackboard, but it is still broadly correct.

Keynesians, monetarists, and Austrians might not agree on much, but they do all agree with the quantity theory. There are other factors involved in how inflation happens, but few doubt that the money supply is the most important factor.

The other key insight to remember is that money is not wealth. Money has value because you can exchange it for wealth — goods and services. Think of an equation with the amount of money on one side and the amount of wealth on the other. When you fiddle with one side but not the other, the price level changes. Printing more money while leaving wealth unchanged causes inflation. So does leaving the money supply alone but reducing the amount of wealth — about which more later.

There Is Nothing Left to Cut

The State Department spent $630,000 in an attempt to get more “likes” on Facebook.

Silly Walk Subsidies

In a new LearnLiberty video, Art Carden explains how subsidies work. He also executes a quality crab walk at about the 1:19 mark. Click here if the embedded video below doesn’t work.

CEI Podcast for July 2, 2013: The True Story of European Austerity

europe satellite night
Have a listen here.

Warren Brookes Fellow Matthew Melchiorre discusses his new study, which finds that, despite the prevailing narrative of severe austerity across Europe, only 4 countries out of 27 have actually cut taxes and spending.

There Is Nothing Left to Cut

The NSA’s website has a children’s section featuring cartoon mascots and video games.

CEI Podcast for June 13, 2013: Deirdre McCloskey Wins CEI’s Julian Simon Award

deirdre mccloskey
Have a listen here.

Deirdre McCloskey, a distinguished economic historian and author of many books, including The Rhetoric of Economics, The Bourgeois Virtues, and Bourgeois Dignity, will receive CEI’s Julian Simon Memorial Award on June 20 at CEI’s annual dinner. CEI Founder and Chairman Fred Smith talks about how McCloskey’s work embodies the same joie de vivre and optimistic spirit that animated Simon’s thought.

Rent-Seeking Watch: Former Rep. Jason Altmire

Back when he was a congressman, Jason Altmire (D-PA) bucked his own party and voted against the Affordable Care Act. He left office earlier this year and now works for a health insurance company in Florida. Seeing as the law legally requires people to buy his employer’s product, he unsurprisingly now supports the law.

The Median Voter Theorem Explained

There is a good reason for the time-tested presidential election strategy of candidates taking relatively progressive or conservative positions during the primaries, and then moving to the center for the general election. It’s because the way to win an election is to appeal to the median voter. In a partisan primary, that median voter is relatively ideological. But in a general election, the median voter is centrist.

This is the median voter theorem, and it plays a key role in understanding how politicians behave during election season. It explains why the two parties can be so hard to tell apart — they’re chasing after the same voter. Utah State University economics professor Diana Thomas ably explains the median voter in this short Learn Liberty video (click here if the embed doesn’t work):

In Defense of Interest

The concept of lending money for interest hasn’t needed many defenders since roughly the Renaissance, when usury laws fell out of fashion. Even so, some people are still innocent of economics and the time value of money. They still attack the very notion of interest. Ludwig von Mises offers a pithy defense on p. 41 of 1940’s Interventionism: An Economic Analysis:

In order to do away with interest we would have to prevent people from valuing a house, which today is habitable, more highly than a house which will not be ready for use for ten years. Interest is not peculiar to the capitalistic system only. In a socialist community too the fact will have to be considered that a loaf of bread which will not be ready for consumption for another year does not satisfy present hunger.

Objections to interest then, must clear hurdles as high as human nature, hunger, and time itself. Good luck, I say.

Regulation of the Day 231: Serving Olive Oil

olive-oil
When you sit down at a Mediterranean restaurant, your server will typically set down some bread on the table, then pour some olive oil into a saucer or small bowl for dipping. Many restaurants also keep small jugs of olive oil as part of their table setting for general use. It’s a delicious way to begin a meal.

New European Union regulations are set to change this centuries-long practice. Starting January 1, 2014, any olive oil served at table “must be in pre-packaged, factory bottles with a tamper-proof dispensing nozzle and labelling in line with tight EU standards.” That means no more saucers of oil for dipping, and no more refillable jugs at the table.

Most complaints about the rule have been directed at the EU’s micromanagemerial tendencies, and there is certainly something to it. But there is also a public choice angle that’s worth looking at.

Many restaurants buy their olive oil from small family farms that aren’t able to comply with the new labeling and sealing standards. Restaurants buy from them because many diners prefer their olive oil to the more homogenous product put out by larger firms. These larger firms are also precisely the people who will benefit from the new rules. A public choice theorist would point out that the big producers very likely had something to do with pushing for their passage, and their added business comes at the expense of smaller farms – and consumers’ palettes.

This kind of rent-seeking behavior is all too common. And the more regulations there are, the more rent-seeking one sees. These olive oil rules are only the latest example. Most supporters of the rule might be motivated by health and safety, but certain other supporters are more concerned with securing an artificial competitive advantage for themselves.