Monthly Archives: August 2011

Bizarre Taxes

The TurboTax blog has a fun infographic of weird taxes. From soda fountains to household pets, there’s a tax for almost any occasion.

How Not to Improve Traffic Conditions

In Arlington, Virginia, “Neighbors wanted $16,000 worth of speed humps, she said. What they got was $200,000 worth of concrete dividers and narrowed lanes that they said increased the risk of drivers being rear-ended while turning into the neighborhood.”

Brewers 5, Cardinals 3

An extra-inning Brewers win in St. Louis puts them 4 games ahead in the NL Central.

Their magic number is now 43.

Regulation of the Day 193: Cleaning Up After Riots

Rioters and looters have run loose in London over the last three nights. During the day, civilized folk have tried to clean up after them. In a heartening display of spontaneous order, many people are organizing group cleanup efforts using Twitter. Following hashtags like #londoncleanup and #riotcleanup lets people know where they’re needed the most. Facebook groups are serving the same purpose.

Health and safety regulators are trying to stop this spontaneous show of goodwill. The Telegraph reports:

[O]fficers told the volunteers that the decision had been made for the clean-up to be done by the council.

Asked why, an officer said: “Health and safety mainly. There’s lots of broken glass around.”

Many storefronts have broken windows, you see. Broken glass can be dangerous. Better to leave the cleanup to professionals. Someone could get hurt.

This is a different broken window fallacy than the kind one usually sees.

Know Your Audience

Jon Huntsman is running for president as a Republican. Speaking to a tea party group on Sunday, he talked up his conservative credentials.

This bold stance garnered national headlines.

Wouldn’t it be more newsworthy if a professional vote-scrounger like Huntsman told an audience something they didn’t want to hear?

The Big Repeal

Congress and the White House have typically been reluctant to repeal any laws or regulations, regardless of which party is in power. The solution? Change the institutional rules of the game to give them an incentive to repeal laws. CEI Research Associate Jacque Otto and I expound on that idea in The American Spectator.

One reform would be a Repeal Amendment to the Constitution. That would give states a veto power over federal laws if two thirds of them vote for repeal. Georgetown law professor Randy Barnett has already drafted some language:

Any provision of law or regulation of the United States may be repealed by the several states, and such repeal shall be effective when the legislatures of two-thirds of the several states approve resolutions for this purpose that particularly describe the same provision or provisions of law or regulation to be repealed.

We have other ideas:

Short of that, the House and Senate could establish repeal committees. These committees would be unable to pass laws and regulations, only to repeal them. Its members would be ineligible to sit on other committees. The only accomplishments they would be able to tout to voters would be how much they lighten Washington’s heavy hand.

Another option is to add an automatic sunset provision to all new regulations — meaning that they would expire after, say, five years unless specifically reauthorized by Congress. This kind of regulatory expiration date would ensure that only the truly necessary ones stay in the books.

Read the whole thing here.

Regulation of the Day 192: Fire Extinguishers

Britain has a Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents. It isn’t quite living up to its name, though. The group is pressing to ban fire extinguishers. They think it would prevent more accidents if residents fled burning buildings instead of fighting the flames themselves.

Many high-rise buildings are starting to take the Royal Society’s recommendation. Mike Edwards lives in one of those buildings. As he told Metro:

‘They are worried we will point them in the wrong direction or use the wrong extinguishers,’ he said. ‘But if you are trapped in a burning building, you will work out how to use one.’

So there you have it. According to the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents, the risk of spraying yourself with a fire extinguisher outweighs the risk of burning to death.

Brewers 7, Astros 3

The Brewers completed a sweep of the Astros yesterday. The Cardinals are keeping pace, though. They swept the Marlins by winning yesterday’s game 8-4.

That brings Milwaukee’s magic number to 45.

Both teams have today off, then play each other in a three-game series in St. Louis.

Brewers 7, Astros 5

The Brewers win again. Meanwhile, the second-place Cardinals beat the Florida Marlins, 2-1. Milwaukee’s record moves to 64-50; St. Louis is now 61-53.

With 61 wins so far and 48 games to go, St. Louis has a maximum possible win total of 109. If the Cardinals win out the rest of the season, that means the Brewers would need 110 wins to guarantee winning the division. With their 64 wins, that would take 46 more wins to assure Milwaukee a playoff spot. That’s their magic number.

Of course, even the best team isn’t going to win 48 games in a row. Every Cardinal loss means one less victory the Brewers need to clinch.

That means any combination of Brewer victories and and Cardinal losses adding up to 46 will guarantee Milwaukee an NL Central division championship.

This also means that this blog’s previous magic number calculations were too high by 10; mea culpa.

Lemonade Freedom Day in the Wall Street Journal

The Wall Street Journal‘s “Notable and Quotable” section quotes this blogger on Lemonade Freedom Day. The link is here, or you can go to page A13 of the print edition.