Some people want to cure malaria by reducing carbon emissions. Others want to cure it with mosquito nets, better health care and sanitation. Which is a more effective use of our limited resources? The answer is important; malaria kills about one million people every year. Getting it wrong costs lives.
According to Bjørn Lomborg, “For the money it takes to save one life with carbon cuts, smarter policies could save 78,000 lives. ”
Let’s pursue those smarter policies, then.
Comments Off on Lomborg Strikes Again
Posted in Economics, The New Religion
Tagged africa, Bjørn Lomborg, global warming, malaria
Bjørn Lomborg, head of the Copenhagen Consensus, brings some much-needed common sense to the global warming debate. Reporting from Vanuatu, he finds that many of the locals haven’t even heard of global warming.
Torethy Frank is one of them. She has other priorities, such as escaping crushing poverty: “Torethy and her family of six live in a small house made of concrete and brick with no running water. As a toilet, they use a hole dug in the ground. They have no shower and there is no fixed electricity supply.”
You can see why the two degrees of projected warming over the next century are not at the top of her “problems to solve” list. I would argue that ending global poverty should be a little higher on ours. Certainly higher than global warming.
Comments Off on Keeping Priorities Straight
Posted in Great Thinkers, The New Religion
Tagged Bjørn Lomborg, bjorn lomborg, copenhagen consensus, economic development, global warming, poverty, priorities, The New Religion, tradeoffs, vanuatu
Inertia Wins! 